NoSoftwarePatents.com

Low Tech Blog
The purpose of this blog is to give me a place to organize and publish my thoughts. It is low tech because I create the content manually using the vi text editor; and I manage said content with a home grown perl script. The only way to make a comment on the site is to email me and convince me to publish it.

The contents of this site are my opinions and should not be taken as advice of any kind. I try to be as accurate as possible in my research but I make no guarantee regarding the accuracy, reliability and/or completeness of any information on this site. The articles on this site reflect my opinions at the time of writing, but my opinions can and probably will change without notice.
--Craig Pennington


18 Apr 2005

SCOXE's Financial Future: Another Look

Newsflash: SCOXE still worthless.

Well SCOXE's 10-K finally came out with few surprises for anyone; as did the delinquint 10-Q for the quarter ending 31 January 2005. Once again, using my understanding of the method described in the Streetsmart Guide to Valuing a Stock by Gray, Custasis and Woolridge, I tried to come up with a value for SCOXE stock. It will come as no shock that the company having never shown a profit and showing no sign of ever intending to show a profit still does not have a positive value. I do believe that they have slowed their bleeding quite a bit and I now think that they may be able to make it into calendar year 2006.

[More to come]

You can find the OpenOffice.org spreadsheet with my calculations here. If you don't have OpenOffice.org, you can get it for free here.

References
http://www.valuepro.net/ with whom I am in no way affiliated.
10-K for Fiscal Year 2004
10-Q for the quarter ending January 31, 2005
Yahoo! Finance SCOXE Key Statistics

Disclaimer: I am a software developer and have no formal training in financial analysis. At the time of writing, I hold a short position in SCOXE stock and will profit if the price of SCOXE stock drops. Nothing on this page should be construed as investment advice. The information contained on this page is believed to be accurate but no guarantee is made. Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.


9 Mar 2005

AAPL's Value: An Amateur Analysis

I bought stock in Apple Computer, Inc. (AAPL) a few years ago when the company released the initial version of their Mach/FreeBSD based operating system, OS X. I thought that all of my fellow Microsoft loathing Unix friends would buy Macs for their circle of free tech support family members (which is exactly what I've done -- I converted my wife when I bought the stock, and I will have the last hold out, my mother-in-law, using one of the Mac Mini's by the end of the month.)

I ended up selling the stock a year ago, making about $10/share. I thought the iPod was winding down and that most of the OS X converts were converted. I also didn't really understand how to value a stock, and it's the subsequent $55/share (pre split) that I gave up that made me decide to learn how to estimate a value for a stock. After getting my feet wet with an attempt to value SCOXE, I thought I'd try my hand at computing an intrinsic value for AAPL based on the same Free Cash Flow to the Firm model from the book Streetsmart Guide to Valuing a Stock by Gray, Custasis and Woolridge. Here's what I came up with.

Assumptions Comment
Revenue 9,763,000 As reported for the last 4 Quarters
Revenue Growth 26.61% Annual Compounded Rate from 2002 to Q105
Net Operating Profit Margin 3.14% Total NOPM from FY2002 to Q105
Tax Rate 35% Assuming maximum corporate rate
Share Price $39.35 Close on 9 Mar 2005
Shares Outstanding 817,170 As reported on Yahoo! Finance
Investment Rate 1.95% As reported for the last 4 Quarters
Working Capital (as a % of Revenue) -16.93% Mean rate for FY2002-FY2004
Depreciation Rate 1.62% As reported for the last 4 Quarters
Beta 1.833 As reported by Yahoo! Finance
Short Term Assets 8,322,000 As reported for Q105
Short Term Liabilities 9,362,000 As reported for Q105
Long Term Debt 0 As reported for Q105

Now I believe Apple is on the rise, and I expect that they'll be able to leverage their reputation for quality and design for a the foreseeable future. So I expect a 10 Year Excess Return Period, based on my reading of the situation and of my understanding of the 1-5-7-10 RULE.

Here is how I value AAPL, given my understanding of the ValuePro model:
Year 1 Year 5 Year 7 Year 10
Estimated Revenue 12,360,518 31,757,783 50,904,589 103,303,984
Estimated Net Operating Profit 388,253 997,536 1,598,951 3,244,855
Estimated Taxes 135,889 349,137 559,663 1,135,699
Estimated Net Operating Profit After Taxes 252,364 648,398 1,039,318 2,109,156
Change in Investment 40,514 104,092 166,849 338,598
Estimated Working Capital -439,704 -1,129,729 -1,810,844 -3,674,864
Free Cash Flow to the Firm 651,555 1,674,035 2,683,313 5,445,422
Discounted FCFF 595,033 1,063,442 1,421,675 2,197,506

Period of Excess Return 1 Year 5 Year 7 Year 10 Year
Residual Value 2,656,748 6,825,962 10,941,343 22,203,976
Discounted Residual Value 2,426,276 4,336,238 5,796,950 8,960,438
Corporate Value 11,343,309 16,719,935 20,831,902 29,737,258
Value to Common 8,119,309 13,495,935 17,607,902 26,513,258
Estimated Share Price $9.94 $16.52 $21.55 $32.45

So, I estimate the current value of the stock to be $32.45. Given the current price of $39.50, I probably won't be buying AAPL anytime soon. In fact, if I held it such that any capital gains would be taxed as long term, I would consider selling it. But given my history on this stock, I'm a bit gun shy on selling -- I'd probably just hold.

You can find the spreadsheet with my calculations here. If you don't have OpenOffice.org, you can get it for free here.

References
http://www.valuepro.net/ with whom I am in no way affiliated.
Yahoo! Finance AAPL Summary Page

Disclaimer: I am a software developer and have no formal training in financial analysis. At the time of writing, I hold no position in AAPL stock but may buy or sell the stock short at any time. Nothing on this page should be construed as investment advice. The information contained on this page is believed to be accurate but no guarantee is made. Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.

older articles

This site is powered by vi


Copyright 2005 Craig Pennington
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.